Changes to the National Wetland Plant List

Swamp Stomp

Volume 14, Issue 15

Changes to the National Wetland Plant List

I have been checking twice a day on the federal regulations.gov site to see if the new EPA waters of the US rules have been posted.  As of April 14, 2014 they have not.  I sat in on a webinar with EPA last week and they had said that they would be in the federal register by the end of last week (4/11/14).  As soon as they are posted I will send out a quick note to all of our newsletter subscribers.

There has been some grumbling in Congress about these new rules.  However nothing has moved forward or backward.  It is Congress after all.  They are now in recess.  Perhaps now would be a good time to publish the new rules while they are on break.  We will keep an eye on it.

There has been one more important wetland update that happened this month.  On April 3, 2014 the new 2014 National Wetland Plant list was published.  This new list has some significant changes in it and it to be used on all active wetland delineations.  There is some “grandfathering” for projects currently under review however; it is the intention of the Corps to require this list to be in full use by May 1, 2014.

The following is a summary of the rating changes from 2013 to 2014.

Region*

Type

OBL

FACW

FAC

FACU

Total

AGCP

new

13

16

8

6

43

range ext.

29

28

50

50

157

AK

new

2

2

0

0

4

range ext.

4

4

3

12

23

AW

new

8

10

5

12

35

range ext.

29

16

30

51

126

CB

new

0

0

0

0

0

range ext.

2

2

2

3

9

EMP

new

8

11

7

9

35

range ext.

40

59

53

57

209

GP

new

2

2

2

3

9

range ext.

36

34

52

53

175

HI

new

0

3

1

0

4

range ext.

2

4

3

7

16

MW

new

4

3

2

5

14

range ext.

16

38

29

40

123

NCNE

new

15

16

6

14

51

range ext.

24

29

25

56

134

WMVC

new

2

8

8

7

25

range ext.

24

26

25

27

102

National

new

54

71

39

56

220

range ext.

206

240

272

356

1,074

These species were reevaluated using challenge study protocols. An asterisk indicates that a species was formally challenged with a written challenge proposal. The remaining species were informally challenged via email inquiries.

Species Region Pre-Challenge Rating Decided by Post-Challenge Rating
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Grande AGCP FACW National Panel FACU
* Aristida beyrichiana Trin. & Rupr. AGCP —- Regional Panel FAC
Helianthus tuberosus L. AGCP —- National Panel FACU
Lonicera japonica Thunb. AGCP FAC National Panel FACU
* Agalinis calycina Pennell. AW —- Regional Panel OBL
Helianthus tuberosus L. AW —- National Panel FACU
* Pogogyne clareana J.T. Howell AW FACU Regional Panel FACW
Helianthus tuberosus L. EMP —- National Panel FACU
Sambucus nigra L. EMP FACU Regional Panel FAC
* Agalinis calycina Pennell. GP —- Regional Panel OBL
*Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer GP OBL Regional Panel FAC
Ambrosia trifidia L. GP —- Regional Panel FAC
Helianthus tuberosus L. GP —- National Panel FACU
Helianthus tuberosus L. MW —- Regional Panel FACU
Centaurea jacea L. NCNE —- Regional Panel FACU
Helianthus tuberosus L. NCNE —- National Panel FACU
Viburnum nudum L. NCNE FACU National Panel FACW
Helianthus tuberosus L. WMVC —- National Panel FACU

There are also three new important documents about plants and wetland delineations posted on the National Wetland Plant List site.  The first one has a direct relationship to the “page 29” wetland delineations discussed in the new EPA rules.   The document is entitled “Use of LiDAR to Assist in Delineating Waters of the United States, Including Wetlands,” March 2014.  The intention of this program is to reduce the amount of field work necessary to do wetland delineations.  I am OK with using LiDAR to “assist”, but don’t take away my soil auger!

The second document is entitled,” Field Testing New Plot Designs and Methods for Determining Hydrophytic Vegetation during Wetland Delineations in the United States,” March 2014.  This one is focused on a new way to calculate the presence of wetland plants by using a new model called Hydrophytic Cover Index (HCI).

The third plant document of the month is entitled, “Examining Discrepancies Among Three Methods Used to Make Hydrophytic Vegetation Determinations for Wetland Delineation Purposes,” March 2014.  This document compares what we do now using the dominance test and prevalence index with the new HCI test in the aforementioned document.

We will be reviewing each of these in our upcoming newsletters.

Have a great week and Happy Easter!

Best,

Marc

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *